Journal of
Stellar Peacemaking

©2007 Journal of Stellar Peacemaking
Vol.2 No. 1,  2007

Home Index Contents  


Kirikkale University, Kirikkale Turkey

Increased violence at schools in Turkey necessitates research on the reasons for, and solutions to, such violence. Prior research has found that students in conflict with their peers are unable to control their anger and display verbal or physical aggression to others—particularly adolescent students dealing with their peer conflicts. Using a questionnaire, this study examined how adolescents may be helped to form healthy relations with their peers and use positive conflict resolution by applying the skills learned in the Conflict Resolution Education Program. This research used a pretest-posttest control group with 68 adolescent students (31 girls, 37 boys) along with a wait-list control group and a placebo control group. The findings indicated an increase in the positive conflict resolution skills among students in the experimental group. Follow-up with the same populations indicated sustained and increased positive scores.

In the past, behaviors such as chewing gum, running in school corridors, and talking loudly were major disciplinary problems facing teachers. However, today’s problems range from physical and verbal aggression to brutal behaviors including weapon use and homicide. Such problems require significant time and effort from teachers implementing conflict resolution in classrooms (Johnson & Johnson, 1995). Conflict is a normal and inevitable part of not only daily life, but also school life. When students are unsuccessful at resolving their conflicts with each other and their teachers, they may become aggressive. Students’ conflicts with their peers generally stem from situations such as determining who sits where in the cafeteria, what game to play during recess, when to study and play, when to speak or listen, and who cleans up the mess in the classroom. The importance of such situations is not the existence of the conflict itself, but the ability to resolve it in a constructive manner (Newman, Murray & Lussier, 2001).

Managing conflicts constructively is one of the most important competencies that children and adolescents need to master, particularly because the frequency and destructiveness of such interpersonal conflicts among students have become serious issues facing schools (Johnson and Johnson, 1996). Students’ conflicts have been increasingly characterized by physical and verbal aggression, incivility, and property damage. When conflicts are resolved destructively, little effort is made, learning and teaching desires are lessened, studies are interrupted, and relationships are broken. In the case of destructive resolution, one party reaches its goals while the other does not; both feel anger at and distrust for the other, and the possibility to solve conflicts constructively decreases (Coleman & Fisher-Yoshida, 2004).


Students’ Inadequate Conflict Resolution Skills

Cross-cultural studies on the increased aggression at schools have shown that students’ inadequate conflict resolution skills increase aggression at schools. Trusting their physical advantage, some students behave aggressively and violently. Others attack verbally, maintain interpersonal distance, or isolate peers by organizing others to act on their behalf. During the conflict process, students follow different courses, which may lead to distorted relationships in the school setting (Brinson, Kottler & Fisher, 2004; Desivilya, 2004). Thus, school counselors must develop and implement educational programs that teach conflict resolution processes, methods of cooperation, and reconciliation (Barsky, 2000; Brinson, Kottler & Fisher, 2004).

Increased school violence has necessitated examination of the reasons for and possible solutions to this situation. Research findings have indicated that students in conflict with their peers are not able to control their anger; they display verbal or physical aggression to one another (Stevahn, 2004). Adolescents’ perception of physical and verbal attacks as effective coping strategies in dealing with conflicts with others destroys their peer relations. Students who are taught positive conflict resolution strategies that effectively protect the interests of all parties have a better opportunity to develop more efficient and healthier educational environments. For example, Johnson and Johnson’s (2000) research indicated that, after conflict resolution training, 92 percent of the experimental group students changed their conflict resolution strategies and acquired more constructive strategies for dealing with conflicts.


School-based Programs

In response to human violence, numerous school-based conflict resolution and peer mediation programs have been created and adopted (Daunic, Smith, Robinson, Landry & Miller, 2000; Smith, Daunic, Miller & Robinson, 2002). Although the programs differ in origin, philosophy and design, their basic intent is to help students learn to constructively manage interpersonal conflicts. Constructive conflict resolution helps both parties see the problem more clearly, produce new ideas, develop and maintain a respecting and trusting relationship with others, reach prosocial goals, and increase the potential to positively transform and resolve future conflicts (Deutsch & Coleman, 2000). However, despite the abundance of school-based conflict training programs, most are not linked to conflict resolution theory or research and do not provide sound empirical evidence on effectiveness (Johnson & Johnson, 2000; Stevahn, 2004).

Some researchers have found that, prior to conflict resolution and peer mediation training in school, students preferred using force, withdrawal, and compromising strategies to resolve conflicts. After the training, the results revealed that students used integrative negotiation procedures for resolving conflicts (Johnson & Johnson, 1994; Chen, 2003; Lane-Garon & Richardson, 2003). Additional studies have also indicated that such training leads to significant increases in win-win outcomes and decreases in the number of conflicts observed by teachers (Gerber & Terry-Day, 1999).


The Conflict Resolution Education Program

The Conflict Resolution Education Program was created for use with groups to provide information on the nature of conflict, factors causing conflict, and the continuation of conflict as well as to foster awareness and skills for constructively transforming and resolving conflicts. The program is oriented to facilitate prosocial interaction.

The development of the Conflict Resolution Education Program (CRP) incorporated various techniques, activities, and experiences to ensure content was applicable; the training was planned and tested for effectiveness in increasing positive conflict resolution skills within the context of the study. Perspectives and studies for improving positive conflict resolution skills among students using peer mediation were examined including the following the techniques listed below:

The CRP was designed in a way to teach positive conflict resolution and communication skills and help students successfully apply them. The goal of the CRP was to have students understand the nature of interpersonal conflicts, acquire positive attitudes toward conflicts and gain skills to resolve their conflicts with their peers. Since its aim was educating adolescents on cooperative conflict resolution techniques, all theoretical points of view were taken into consideration at some point; however, cognitive behavior theories and theories of social relations were addressed more than others. During the development of the CRP, current literature was reviewed, including books on communication and previously developed programs (Dokmen, 1994; Johnson & Johnson, 1996; Meyer & Northup, 1997; Schrumpf, Crawford & Bodine, 1997; Jones, 1998; Teolis, 1998; Oner, 1999; Barsky, 2000; Bemak & Keys, 2000; Carrell, 2000; Gentry, 2000; Shure, 2001).

Although some steps of the CRP existed in other programs, it was not constructed copiously from those programs. The structure of the CRP followed the targets determined at the beginning of each session, including behavioral goals. Slogans determined for every session were presented on posters as visual aids. One important aspect of the program that focused on enhancing its effectiveness was the incorporation of the determined instruments and homework activities into files that were given to students for during- as well as after-session use.


General Purpose

The general purpose of the CRP was to teach skills that might help sixth graders positively resolve their conflicts with their peers. Students were expected to gain conflict resolution skills and life experiences that would help them apply problem-solving techniques in future situations. The program consists of 8 sessions, each of which lasted about eighty minutes.


Intervention Content

Following are descriptions of the educational sessions of the CRP.

Session 1. The first session involved group formation and learning about conflict and its nature:

Session 2. The second session focused on building a trusting environment, understanding reasons for and reactions to conflict:

Session 3. Participants then learned to understand alternative conflict resolution methods and how each affects the result of the conflict:

Session 4. Next participants focused on active listening, constructive talking, listening to understand emotions, and the development of skills to differentiate events from emotions:

Session 5. The fifth session focused on understanding the difference between “I statements” and “you statements,” use of “I statements”:

Session 6. Participants developed their emphatic thinking skills and enhance their ability to understand others’ perspectives:

Session 7. In this session, participants learned to use first four steps of conflict resolution:

Session 8. The final session focused on applying the last four steps of the conflict resolution process:



To determine the relevance and effectiveness of the CRP, this study addressed the following questions:

  1. Do those sixth grade elementary students who participate in the conflict resolution training demonstrate measurable differences in their skills while those who do not participate fail to demonstrate such measurable differences?
  2. If both groups demonstrate measurable differences, is the increase among participants greater than among non-participants?
  3. Is this increase lasting?

Design of the Study

The investigator aimed to empirically identify the effectiveness of the CRP and report that for use of psychological consultants. Documented during this study was each step of the CRP. As a participant researcher, she prepared sessions, conflict scenarios, activities, and home assignments for the adolescents. She evaluated each session by listening to the audio recordings of it. She also analyzed data in photographs that were taken during the intervention. The sessions were recorded and photographed with the consent of the students.

To further evaluate the outcome of the intervention, the researcher used a pre-test/post-test, between-subjects, split-plot design. The study involved an experimental group, a placebo group, and a control group. The placebo group participated in a five-session educational activity that was different from the CRP. The placebo group received instruction as did the experimental group; received information about conflicts and participated in activities to increase their conflict resolution skills. The control group received no instruction in conflict resolution. All groups took the Conflict Resolution Questionnaire at the pre-test stage. Prior to the application of the questionnaire, participants in the control group were informed that they were given a scale as part of a research study; however, they were not informed about the aim of the study or in which group they participated.

The goal of this study was to examine the possible effects of the CRP intervention, especially students’ levels of knowledge about positive conflict resolution. The independent variable of this study was the training itself, which was applied to the experimental group; the dependent variable was level of knowledge about positive conflict resolution. The CRP was administered in 8 sessions, each of which lasted approximately eighty minutes. During this time, the placebo group participated in activities not related to conflict resolution (goal setting, vocational definition, future planning, responsibility development, etc.). After the completion of the education program, the Conflict Resolution Questionnaire was administered to all three groups as a post-test to identify any significant differences between the three groups’ positive conflict resolution skills, as measured by the instrument.

As a follow-up study, the Conflict Resolution Questionnaire was administered to the experimental, placebo, and control groups for the third time, three months after the second application of the questionnaire, in order to determine if the effects of the program were lasting. Once the follow-up study was completed, students in the control and placebo groups also received instruction with the CRP, as it was thought to be beneficial to their interpersonal relations. Table 1 outlines the use of the instrument.

Table 2. Means and Standard Deviations of Groups’ Pretest-Posttest Questionnaire Scores

           Χ                s
             Χ                 s
Experimental Group 21   96.50          6.97   127.88            12.79
Placebo Group 22   95.28          8.12     96.92           13.21
Control Group 25   96.88          6.32     95.29            10.73


According to the results provided in Table 2, no significant differences were evident among the experimental, placebo, and control groups in their pre-test scores. However, the experimental group demonstrated a significant increase in the means score in the second measurement. No significant difference occurred between the placebo and control groups’ pre- and post-test means. In addition, post-test standard deviations doubled the pre-test standard deviations in all groups. As it was indicated above the placebo group received instruction as did the experimental group; which included information about conflicts and participatopn in related activities, but the control group received no instruction in conflict resolution.

Table 3 provides the results of a 3 (experimental, placebo, and control groups) x2 (pre-test/post-test scores) ANOVA.

Table 3. 3 (experimental, placebo, and control groups) x2 (pre-test/post-test scores) ANOVA Results

Source of variance Sum of Squares SD Mean Square F p
Between groups 9435.82 67      
Group(E/1.C/2.C) 3468.70 2 1734.35 18.89 0.001
Error 5967.12 65 91.80    
Within groups 9326.85 68      
Measurement (Pre/Post) 2026.31 1 2026.31 36.66 0.001
GroupXMeasurement 3707.56 2 1853.78 33.53 0.001
Error 3592.98 65 55.28    
Total 18762.40 135      


As Table 3 indicates, the experimental, control, and placebo groups’ scores differed from each other without controlling for the time of measurement [F(2,65)=18.89, p<.001]. Interaction effects showed that, changes in the experimental group’s positive conflict resolution behavior levels before and after the program differed from those in the control and placebo groups; [F(1,65)=36.66, p<.001]. The experimental, control, and placebo groups’ positive conflict resolution levels, as measured by the instrument, differed due to the variation of educational experiences they had across the groups.

The investigator hypothesized that the effects of the CRP would be lasting. In order to test this hypothesis, the questionnaire was administered in a follow-up study three months after the second testing. The distribution of participants in the experimental, control, and placebo groups as well as their means and standard deviations of the second (post-test) and third (follow-up) questionnaire scores are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Means and Standard Deviations of Groups’ Post-test/Follow-up Questionnaire Scores

Groups n Post-test
Χ                s
Follow-up test
Χ               s
Experimental Group 21 127.88      12.79 136.21    16.21
Placebo Group 22 96.92        13.21 98.87       14.21
Control Group 25 95.29        10.73 97.21       12.60


As Table 4 illustrates differences that occurred between the post-test and the follow-up test that was administered three months after the post-test. All groups’ follow-up scores increased during that three-month period. Perhaps familiarity with the statements on the CRQ caused this increase. However, it was much more evident in the experimental group.

In addition to the group and measurement variables, the three groups’ repeated measures 3x2 ANOVA results were determined to test the group by measurement interaction. Table 5 presents these data.


Table 5. 3 (experimental, placebo, and control groups) x2 (post-test/follow-up test scores) ANOVA Results

Source of variance Sum of Squares SD Mean Square F p
Between groups 9872.98 67      
Group(E/1.C/2.C) 3627.10 2 1813.55 18.87 0.001
Error 6245.88 65 96.09    
Within groups 9853.14 68      
Measurement(Post/Follow-up) 2279.29 1 2279.29 40.19 0.001
GroupXMeasurement 3887.64 2 1943.82 34.27 0.001
Error 3686.21 65 56.71    
Total 19726.12 135      


Table 5 highlights that participants’ post-test and follow-up test questionnaire scores differed according to their groups; [F(2,65)=18.87, p<.001]. As is evident, the positive conflict resolution behaviors of participants who attended the program continued to increase after the implementation of the program. Changes in the experimental group’s positive conflict resolution behavior levels during the time between the post-test and follow-up test differed from changes in the control and placebo groups’ positive conflict resolution behavior levels during this same time; [F(1,65)=40.19, p<.001].

The investigator also hypothesized that the conflict resolution skills acquired as a result of the training would continue to be used over the long-run. To test this hypothesis, the differences between the experimental group’s post-test and follow-up test scores were analyzed using a t-test. Table 6 presents these results.

Table 6. T-test Results of Experimental Group’s Posttest/Follow-up Test Scores















Follow-up test






A significant (p < .05) difference was evident between the total post-test and follow-up test scores within the experimental group.

Instrumentation validated the hypothesis that the positive conflict resolution skills of sixth graders who experienced the CRP increased significantly—more so than the positive conflict resolution skills of sixth graders who did not attend sessions with that program. This increase lasted for three months.


Discussion and Suggestions

The content of the CRP incorporated theoretical perspectives and it was influenced by relevant research. During the development process, students 1) were believed to have incorrect thoughts and attitudes (believing that conflict was a harmful and negative experience); 2) did not know positive conflict resolution techniques and communication skills; and 3) would more likely learn conflict resolution steps only after much practice (presenting samples from real-life experiences, fables, stories, etc.). Moreover, the program sessions facilitated communication in a reciprocally trusting and accepting environment.

As the results indicated, when compared to sixth graders who did not participate in the conflict resolution education program, (a) the positive conflict resolution skills of sixth graders who did participate in conflict resolution education program increased and (b) this increase was lasting. Three months after completing the conflict resolution education program, the experimental group’s progress, measured with the questionnaire, continued to increase.

The hypothesis-building process in this research considered the fact that the CRP consisted of techniques, activities, and experiences that were specified as effective, as supported by several research findings. According to the research findings and theoretical views, the following aspects of the CRP were considered effective means for teaching conflict resolution skills:

The findings regarding the lasting effects of CRP resonate with additional studies that have tested the effects of positive conflict resolution programs for primary and secondary school students who shared some common traits with participants in this study (Johnson & Johnson, 1994; Johnson &, 1997; Oner-Koruklu, 1998; Henkin, Cistone & Dee, 2000; Bedioglu, 2001; Coban, 2002; Stevahn, Johnson, Johnson & Schultz, 2002; Brinson, Kottler & Fisher, 2004). Findings from other similar studies favor those mentioned herein and imply an increase of positive effects over time (Palmer & Roessler 2001; Scott, 2003).

Similar to the findings of Henkin and others (2000), this study’s results indicate that students who experienced the CRP identified positive conflict resolution behaviors. Using the pre-/post-test and treatment/control group experimental design, an increase in awareness of positive conflict resolution behaviors among the experimental group was demonstrated, when compared to the control group, in studies examining the effectiveness of conflict resolution education programs (Johnson & Johnson, 1995; Terzi-Isik, 2000; Kavalci, 2001; Stevahn &, 2002; Coban, 2002; Burrell, Zirbel & Allen, 2003).

In this research, an interactive and informative conflict resolution education program was developed and used to provide sixth graders with the necessary experiences to help them acquire the skills necessary to handle conflicts with their peers effectively. This program was empirically tested for efficacy. The results showed that the program successfully taught adolescents about positive conflict resolution skills; moreover, the effects were lasting. These results indicate that enough evidence exists to support the conclusion that the program was effective and appropriate.



One limitation of the current study is the use of the same questionnaire instrument in all three tests. Participants may have become familiar enough with the items to have impacted the results in some manner. Another limitation was researcher association with the subjects of the study as their educator with the intervention. She was also the creator of the CRP. In addition, the study involved only students in one school in Turkey. Therefore, the results are not necessarily generalizable to other cultural contexts. Strongly recommended is additional research with similar programs in different cultures.


Further Research

The CRP’s effectiveness in developing adolescent’s knowledge of positive conflict resolution strategies, including methods for resolving their conflicts with peers, indicated a need for such education. Its application area may be broadened after required adaptations and empirical testing are completed for different age groups. Thus, future research should address various age groups. In addition, the program has the quality for use by school consultants as a published manual. Because it supports preventive guidance activities, it may be useful in easing psychological consultants’ burdens. Research in this area would be beneficial to these professionals.

The results of the study, integrated with studies from the current literature, contribute to the findings of experimental studies that show the effectiveness of conflict resolution education. In addition, emphasizing an area lacking in Turkey—namely, studies using both conflict resolution education and peer mediation programs—further contributes to enhancing school programs including psychological counseling services. Meanwhile, program samples tested for their effectiveness may guide the development of additional and more influential interventions for similar or related problem areas.



Barsky, A. E. (2000).Conflict resolution for the helping professions. Canada: Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning.

Bedioglu, M. (2001). The effect of the program for young negotiators on preservice elementary school teachers conflict resolution strategies. Unpublished master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Social Science Institute, Ankara.

Bemak, F. & Keys, S. (2000). Violent and aggressive youth. Intervention and prevention strategies for changing times. Thousand Oaks: CA: Corwin Press.

Brinson, J. A, Kottler, J. A. & Fisher, T. A. (2004). Cross-cultural conflict resolution in the schools: Some practical intervention strategies for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development 82(3), 294-303.

Burrell, N. A., Zirbel, C. S. & Allen, M. (2003). Evaluating peer mediation outcomes in educational settings: A meta-analytic review. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 21(1), 7-27.

Carrell, S. (2000). Group exercises for adolescents. A manual for therapists. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Chen, D. W. (2003). Preventing violence by promoting the development of competent conflict resolution skills: Exploring roles and responsibilities. Early Childhood Education Journal 30(4), 203-209.

Coban, R. (2002). The effect of conflict resolution training program on elementary school students’ conflict resolution strategies. Unpublished master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Educational Science Institute, Ankara.

Coleman, P. T. & Fisher-Yoshida, B. (2004). Conflict resolution across the lifespan: The work of the ICCCR. Theory into Practice 43(1), 31-40

Daunic, A. P., Smith, S. W., Robinson, T. R., Landry, K. L. & Miller, M. D. (2000). School-wide conflict resolution and peer mediation programs: Experiences in three middle schools. Intervention in School & Clinic 36(2), 94-99. Retrieved October 13, 2000, Web: wysiwyg://bodyframe.17//http://ehostvgw8.e.

Desivilya, H. S. (2004). Promoting coexistence bye means of conflict education: The MACBE model. Journal of Social Issues 60(2), 339-355.

Deutsch, M. & Coleman, P. T. (2000). The handbook of conflict resolution. Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Dokmen, U. (1994). Sanatta ve gunluk yasamda iletisim catismalari ve empati [Communication conflicts and empathy in art and daily life]. Istanbul: Sistem Publication.

Gentry, W. D. (2000). Anger free. Ten basic steps to managing your anger. New York: Harper Collins.

Gerber, S. & Terry-Day, B. (1999). Does peer mediation really work? Professional School Counseling 2(3), 169-171.

Gillespie, C. W. & Chick, A. (2001). Using peers to mediate conflict resolution in a head start classroom. Childhood Education 77(4), 192-195.

Gordon, A. & Mandell, P. L. (2003). Resolution and peer mediation. School Library Journal 49(10), 50-59. Retrieved May 11, 2004, Web:

Henkin, A. B., Cistone, P. J. & Dee, J. R. (2000). Conflict management strategies of principals in site-based managed schools. Journal of Educational Administration 38(2), 142-158.

Humphries, T. L. (1999). Improving peer mediation programs: Student experiences and suggestions. Professional School Counseling 3(1), 13-21.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Constructive conflict in the schools. Journal of Social Issues 50(1), 117-137.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Reducing school violence through conflict resolution. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Teaching all students how to manage conflict constructively: The peacemakers program. Journal of Negro Education 65(3), 322-335.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Dudley, B., Mitchell, J. & Fredrickson, J. (1997). The impact of conflict resolution training on middle school students. The Journal of Social Psychology 137(1), 11-21.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, F. P. (2000). Joining together: Group theory and group skills, (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Jones, A. (1998). 104 activities that build: Self-esteem teamwork communication anger management self-discovery coping skills. Richland: Rec Room Publishing.

Kavalci, Z. (2001). Catisma cozme egitimi programinin universite ogrencilerinin catisma cozme bicimleri uzerindeki etkisi [The effects of conflict resolution education program on conflict resolution styles of university students]. Unpublished master thesis, Hacettepe University, Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.

Lane-Garon, P. S. & Richardson, T. (2003). Mediator mentors: Improving school climate, nurturing student disposition. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 21(1), 47-68.

Lulofs, R. S. & Cahn, D. D. (2000). Conflict from theory to action. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, A Pearson Education Company.

McClellan, J. (1997). Conflict resolution: How do you deal with conflict? Conflict resolution questionnaire. Retrieved Spring, 2002, Web:

Meyer, A. L. & Northup, W. B. (1997). What is violence prevention, anyway? Educational Leadership 54(8), 31-44.

Newman, R. S., Murray, B. & Lussier, C. (2001). Confrontation with aggressive peers at school: Students’ reluctance to seek help from the teacher. Journal of Educational Psychology 93(2), 398-410.

Oner-Koruklu, N. (1998). Arabuluculuk egitiminin ilkogretim duzeyindeki bir grup ogrencinin catisma cozme davranislarina etkisinin incelenmesi [Examination of the effect of peer mediation education on conflict resolution behaviors of a group of primary school students]. Unpublished master thesis, Ankara University Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.

Oner, U. (1999). Ilkogretimde rehberlik (Guiding in primary school). Y. Kuzgun (Ed.). Catisma cozme ve arabuluculuk egitimi [Conflict resolution and mediation education) (pp. 189-227]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

Palmer, C. & Roessler, R. T. (2001). Requesting classroom accommodations: Self-advocacy and conflict resolution training. Journal of Rehabilitation 66(3), 38-43.

Ronnie, C. (1998). The benefits of peer mediation in the context of urban conflict and program status. Urban Education 35(3), 324-356. Retrieved October 15, 2000, Web: wysiwyg://bodyframe.14//http://ehostvgw15.

Schrumpf, F., Crawford, D. K. & Bodine, R. J. (1997). Peer mediation conflict resolution in school. Program guide. (Revised Edition). Illinois: Research Press.

Scott, K. (2003). Exploring the intragroup conflict constructs and behaviors of african american public school children in an inner-city conflict resolution (CRE) program. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 21(1), 95-114.

Shure, M. B. (2001). I can problem solve. An interpersonal cognitive problem-solving program. Illinois: Research Press.

Smith, S. W., Daunic, A. P., Miller, M. D. & Robinson, T. R. (2002). Conflict resolution peer mediation in middle schools: Extending the process and outcome knowledge base. Journal of Social Psychology 142(5), 567-591.

Stevahn, L., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Schultz, R. (2002). Effects of conflict resolution training integrated into a high school social studies curriculum. Journal of Social Psychology 142(3), 305-328.

Stevahn, L. (2004). Integrating conflict resolution training into the curriculum. Theory into Practice 43(1), 50-61.

Stevens, R. (2003). Conflict resolution and peer mediation: Underlying values. Encounter 16(2) 52-56. Retrieved April 5, 2004, Web:

Teolis, B. (1998). Ready-to-use. Conflict resolution activities for elementary students. New York: The Center for Applied Research in Education.

Terzi-Isik, S. (2000). Ilkogretim okulu altinci sinif ogrencilerinin kisiler arasi problem cozme beceri algilarinin bazi degiskenler acisindan incelenmesi [Examination of the perceptions of interpersonal problem solving ability of sixth-grade students according as some variables]. Unpublished master thesis, Gazi University Social Sciences Institute, Ankara.



Assistant Professor
Educational Faculty Department of Educational Sciences
Kirikkale University

Place and Date of Birth: Samsun (TURKEY)-03.01.1969


(BA) Hacettepe University Department of Psychology

Middle East Technical University English Preparatory Class

(MA) Middle East Technical University Department of Psychology Social Psychology Program

Thesis Subject: “Interspousal Communication in a Problem Solving Situation”

(PhD) Ankara University Institute for Educational Sciences Department of Educational Psychology

Working Interest: Communication, conflict resolution, peer mediation, adolescent development, child and adolescent employment





[an error occurred while processing this directive]
web site design, maintenance and hosting by   SkyIsland Systems.